On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > There's a comment that looks related to this issue in syncrep.c. It reads: > > /* > * We don't receive SIGHUPs at this point, so resetting > * synchronous_standby_names has no effect on waiters. > */ > > It's unclear to me what this actually means. Is there some reason we > CAN'T receive SIGHUPs at that point, or have we just chosen not to > (for unexplained reasons)?
Not sure. Simon? It seems harmless to receive SIGHUP at that point. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
