Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, the idea is that we don't want to let people depend on the > value until it's guaranteed to be durably committed. OK, so if you see it on the replica, you know it is in at least two places. I guess that makes sense. It kinda "feels" wrong to see a view of the replica which is ahead of the master, but I guess it's the least of the evils. I guess we should document it, though, so nobody has a false expectation that seeing something on the replica means that a connection looking at the master will see something that current. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
