2011/3/22 David Fetter <da...@fetter.org>: > +1 for fixing this behavior in 9.1. -1 for changing in 9.0, as the > change in behavior mid-release will cause more confusion than the > incomplete accounting does.
Idem. > > Cheers, > David. > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 06:44:51PM +0100, Bernd Helmle wrote: >> It stroke me today again, that \dt+ isn't displaying the acurate >> table size for tables, since it uses pg_relation_size() till now. >> With having pg_table_size() since PostgreSQL 9.0 available, i >> believe it would be more useful to have the total acquired storage >> displayed, including implicit objects (the mentioned case where it >> was not very useful atm was a table with a big TOAST table). >> >> Attached minor patch extends \dt to use pg_table_size() starting >> with PostgreSQL 9.0, not sure if we backport such changes though. It >> would be interesting for 9.1, however. >> >> -- >> Thanks >> >> Bernd > > >> >> -- >> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) >> To make changes to your subscription: >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > > > -- > David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ > Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter > Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com > iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics > > Remember to vote! > Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- Cédric Villemain 2ndQuadrant http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
