Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mar 25, 2011, at 9:22 PM, Joshua Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>> Also, I don't understand why this would be a dump/reload issue if $1 and $2
>> continue to work.
> Because an identifier that previously referred unambiguously to a column
> might now be ambiguous, if there is a parameter with the same name.
Yes, a function that previously worked might now throw error, if we make
ambiguous names be errors. But this is *not* a failure that would occur
during dump/reload. You'd have to actually run the function.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
