On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it worth thinking about having an explicit setting for deadlock > priority? That'd be more work, of course, and I'm not sure it it's > worth it, but it'd also provide stronger guarantees than you can get > with this proposal. Priority makes better sense, I think. That's what we're trying to control after all. But you would need to change the way the deadlock detector works... -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers