On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 13:00 -0400, Dan Ports wrote: > While looking into a SSI bug, I noticed that we don't actually display > the pid of the holding transaction, even though we have that > information available.
Is there a chance that the PID will reference a backend that has either
terminated or is idle? That might be confusing.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
