"Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> ... The one I'm most >> worried about is "SSI: three different HTABs contend for shared >> memory in a free-for-all" - because there's no patch for that yet, >> and I am wary of breaking something mucking around with it. > I haven't seen any objection to Heikki's suggestion for how to > handle the shared memory free-for-all:
I confess to not having been reading the discussions about SSI very much, but ... do we actually care whether there's a free-for-all? What's the downside to letting the remaining shmem get claimed by whichever table uses it first? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers