Vladimir Kokovic <vladimir.koko...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 4/7/11, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Vladimir Kokovic
>> <vladimir.koko...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ALTER TABLE "s'd"".s'd"""."s's'd""." ADD COLUMN id bigint DEFAULT
>>> nextval('"s''d".s''d""."s''d".d"s''"');
>>> ERROR: improper relation name (too many dotted names): s'd.s'd"".s'd.d"s'"
>> Treat them as what?
> Even nextval('"s''d".s''d""."s''d".d"s''"') is correct literal,
Really? According to whom? This works for me:
regression=# create schema "s'd"".s'd""";
CREATE SCHEMA
regression=# create table "s'd"".s'd"""."s's'd""." (f1 int);
CREATE TABLE
regression=# create sequence "s'd"".s'd"""."s's'd"".s" ;
CREATE SEQUENCE
regression=# ALTER TABLE "s'd"".s'd"""."s's'd""." ADD COLUMN id bigint DEFAULT
nextval('"s''d"".s''d"""."s''s''d"".s"');
ALTER TABLE
I think you've made up some theory about how to quote funny characters
in nextval's argument, and it's a wrong theory. You have to double
single quotes because you're writing a string literal, but other than
that it should look just like a quoted identifier in SQL.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
