Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > The attached applied patch improves pg_upgrade by: ?avoiding one > > start/stop of the postmaster; ?using the -w (wait) flag for pg_ctl > > start/stop; ?removing the unused "quiet" flag in the functions for > > starting/stopping the postmaster. > > It is well past time to stop tweaking pg_upgrade for 9.1. Feature > freeze was three months ago, and the risk of introducing new bugs at > this point surely outweighs any gain we might get from the changes. > We should only be fixing *bugs* at this point.
Someone at PG East complained pg_upgrade wasn't fast enough for his usage, so I tried to speed it up. (I guess it was a bug for him.) I think not using -w for pg_ctl could be a potential bug because we wack around the files underneath the postmaster when we think it is shut down. The "quiet" change was just a cleanup. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
