On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: >> On balance, I think I prefer the >> current arrangement, though if we could make the CommitFests a bit >> shorter I would certainly like that better. I don't know how to make >> that happen without more reviewers, though. > > Given our current method (where we allow authors to update their patches > during a CF) I don't see that we need or should try for shorter CFs. If > we actually just reviewed patches onces it'd be a very different > situation. > > So, +1 from me for keeping it as-is. I do wonder if this is coming up > now just because we're getting closer to a release and people are, > unsuprisingly, wishing they had been able to get their fav. patch in > before the deadline. :)
+1 from me for keeping it as-is as well. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
