Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > Here is the patch to fix that, as discussed.
Looks sane --- I assume you tested it against the originally complained-of scenario? http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/201103111328.p2bdsfd10...@momjian.us If so, please apply soon --- we need to wrap beta1 this evening. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
