On Apr 28, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > It's been pointed out before that plugins (like FDWs) can invent their own > explain nodes, so we'll never have a canonical list of such nodes.
Oh, interesting. Stil, a list of core nodes is a good 90% solution, IMHO. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
