On 10 May 2011 17:43, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

> It should be an anonymous pipe that's inherited by the child process by
> rather than a named pipe. Otherwise seems fine to me, as far as this proof
> of concept program goes.

Alright, thanks. I'll use an anonymous pipe in the patch itself.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to