I hear that CF manager is a difficult role for a single individual. So it makes sense to split that role between multiple people.
I volunteer to be the CF manager for Replication, and also for Performance. I have an interest in and long experience in each of those areas, so that makes sense for me. The titles refer to the categories on the CF application, self-selected by patch authors, not an increased remit to wade in on anything that appears to fall into those categories. Patches need an eventual committer anyway, so this is a reasonable way of having the process be managed by the eventual committer. I don't see the role as an authoritarian one, so I will happily pass over patches to other committers who may wish that and/or call for help from particular people as required. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
