Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> On tis, 2011-05-24 at 23:26 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> There's a complaint here
>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2011-05/msg00714.php
>>> about the fact that 9.1 pg_dump always dumps CREATE EXTENSION commands
>>> for all loaded extensions. Should we change that? A reasonable
>>> compromise might be to suppress extensions in the same cases where we
>>> suppress procedural languages, ie if --schema or --table was used
>>> (see "include_everything" switch in pg_dump.c).
>> Making it work like procedural languages seems sensible to me.
> The same problem still exists for foreign data wrappers, servers, and
> user mappings. It should probably be changed in the same way.
No objection here, but I'm not going to go do it ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
