On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 19:10, Joe Abbate <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/31/2011 12:41 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote: >> The point is that the community seems to have reached a consensus >> that they would rather use this URL for the above message: >> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected] > > OK, as I said, I can still capture the message-id's by crawling -bugs by > year-month.
Just to be clear, crawling the current archives for this info is probably the easiest part of the whole project. In fact, the majority of the information you'd need is *already* in a postgresql database on search.postgresql.org. So - let's start in the other end, and get back to this if/when it's needed. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
