On 06/02/2011 01:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Marko Kreen's message of jue jun 02 12:45:04 -0400 2011:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote:
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of jue jun 02 11:59:02 -0400 2011:
On 06/02/2011 11:29 AM, Marko Kreen wrote:
As there was no going back now, I even touched msvc.pm.
Why? Windows doesn't have Unix domain sockets at all.
So much for being thorough :-P
Well, there is 2 approaches to portable C code:
1) You #ifdef the main code portable
2) You #ifdef common platform in headers, then main code
is written against common platform, without ifdefs.
I'm from the camp #2.
I don't disagree, just saying that you seem to have gone out of your way
to produce something that doesn't seem to be necessary.
Yeah, I'm from the camp that says "don't compile code that's guaranteed
to be dead."
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
