Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of vie jun 03 13:45:57 -0400 2011: > On 3 June 2011 17:58, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of vie jun 03 12:47:58 -0400 2011:
> >> Nice work Alvaro :) Shouldn't patches be sent to -hackers instead of > >> the obsolete -patches list? Plus I'm a bit confused as to why the > >> patch looks like an email instead of a patch. > > > > Did I really email pgsql-patches? If so, I didn't notice -- but I don't > > see it (and the archives seem to agree with me, there's no email after > > 2008-10). > > My bad, I was reading your patch which contained an email subject > beginning with [PATCH] (similar to mailing list subject prefixes) > which, if I had given it any further though, doesn't mean it's on the > -patches list. Ah, that makes sense. The pgsql-patches tag was [PATCHES] actually, though :-) -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
