Dann Corbit wrote: > I should apologize for being rather harsh about embedded SQL for > PostgreSQL. > > To be fair, it does function and it certainly isn't trivial to > implement. I am sure that those who have worked on this project have > invested very many hours of blood, sweat and tears making it work.
Oh, OK. Forget what I said earlier about you writing your own database. :-) > I actually spent a great deal of effort trying to write some tools using > the PostgreSQL version of ECPG, and found fatal flaws that threw away a > couple weeks of work. I think that is why my responses were so > overwhelmingly negative. I assume this is because you wrote your code assuming a feature was in ecpg, but it wasn't, right? > Here is what I would like to see (consider a gentle suggestion): > > A reentrant version of ECPG that uses SQLCA and SQLDA like Oracle or Rdb > or DB/2 or any of the professional database systems. I see on the TODO list under ECPG: o Implement SQLDA o Add SQLSTATE Are these related to your problem? I see SQLCA in the ecpg code already. Is it implemented incorrectly? If so, I could use items to add to the TODO list. You are actually the first person to complain about this, as far as I can remember. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]