Joshua Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: > Simon, >> The point I have made is that I disagree with a feature freeze date >> fixed ahead of time without regard to the content of the forthcoming >> release. I've not said I disagree with feature freezes altogether, >> which would be utterly ridiculous. Fixed dates are IMHO much less >> important than a sensible and useful feature set for our users.
> This is such a non-argument it's silly. Perhaps more to the point, we've tried that approach in the past, repeatedly, and it's been a scheduling disaster every single time. Slipping the release date in order to get in newly-written features, no matter *how* attractive they are, does not work. Maybe there are people who can make it work, but not us. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers