On 6/11/2011 1:02 AM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Jim Nasby<j...@nasby.net> wrote:
It's damn annoying... enough so that I'd personally be in favor of creating a
pid column that has the same data so we can deprecate
procpid and eventually remove it...
well, if we will start changing bad picked names we will have a *lot*
of work to do... starting by the project's name ;)
There is a difference between a project name and something that directly
affects usability. +1 on fixing this. IMO, we don't create a new pid
column, we just fix the problem. If we do it for 9.2, we have 18 months
to communicate the change.
Joshua D. Drake
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
