Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes:
> Excerpts from richhguard-monotone's message of lun jun 13 16:10:17 -0400 2011:
>> Do you have any advice of how to handle the inner loops, such as those
>> initializing ``stakindN''. The entries before can be handled just like in
>> this patch, by using the symbolic constants.
> Based on Tom's comments, I'd submit the patch without that bit, at least
> as a first step.
He already did no?
I did think of a possible way to rewrite update_attstats: instead of
for (k = 0; k < STATISTIC_NUM_SLOTS; k++)
{
values[i++] = ObjectIdGetDatum(stats->staop[k]); /* staopN */
}
do
for (k = 0; k < STATISTIC_NUM_SLOTS; k++)
{
values[Anum_pg_statistic_staop1 - 1 + k] =
ObjectIdGetDatum(stats->staop[k]);
}
etc. However, it's not clear to me whether this is really an
improvement. Opinions?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
