> With regards to the naming, I think it would be better if we kept > XLOG_XACT_COMMIT record exactly as it is now, and make the second > record an entirely new record called XLOG_XACT_COMMIT_FASTPATH. That > way we retain backwards compatibility. > > If you'd like to rework like that please, otherwise I can take it from > here if you'd like.
I think I did it; while doing it, I think I've found a bug: I didn't update "recoveryStopsHere". Please double check that, as I really don't know what I'm doing there... Should I also change the struct name from xl_xact_commit to xl_xact_commit_fast_path? > > How can I test it with "weird" stuff as subtransactions, shared > > cache invalidation messages...? > > make installcheck should cover those. Ok, all tests passed.
commitlog_lessbytes_v3.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
