Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote: > > Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > OK, fair enough. ?Should I apply my ports patch to Postgres 9.2? > >> > >> I'm not sure which patch you are referring to. > > > > This one which makes 50432 the default port. > > There appear to be some other changes mixed into this patch.
The additional changes were to have the existing environment variables begin with "PG", as requested. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
