Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of mié jun 29 10:30:51 -0400 2011: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 19:45, Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jun 28 10:39:22 -0400 2011: > > > >> I think it would be sensible to block branch removal, as there's > >> basically never a scenario where we'd do that during current usage. > >> I'm not excited about blocking branch addition, although I worry > >> sooner or later somebody will accidentally push a private development > >> branch :-(. Is it possible to block only removal and not addition? > > > > If we can tweak the thing, how about we only allow creating branches > > that match a certain pattern, say ^REL_\d+_\d+_STABLE$? > > I've put this in place - except I used ^REL\d+... and not what you > suggested, since that's how we name our branches :P
Hah! It took me a while to notice the difference :-D Thanks! I know I feel safer with this in place :-P -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
