Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Ah, that opens the door to do something I considered earlier but
> rejected because of alignment: instead of three 32-bit word fetches, we
> could fetch one 64-bit word and 32-bit word. Might shave a few more
> cycles...
Hm ... I suspect that might be a small win on natively-64-bit machines,
but almost certainly a loss on 32-bitters.
> Meanwhile, I experimented with optimizing the other part of the loop:
> the HASH() macros for setting the right bits in the signature.
Yeah, I was eyeing that too, but I'm hesitant to hard-wire assumptions
about the size of the signature.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
