Robert, > We need to start marking the patches that are "Waiting on Author" as > "Returned with Feedback", ideally after checking that the status in > the CF application is in fact up to date. With a week left in the > CommitFest at this point, anything that has been reviewed and still > has issues is pretty much going to have to wait for the next round. > We need to focus on (a) reviewing the patches that haven't been > reviewed yet and (b) getting the stuff that is basically in good > shape > committed. Otherwise, we're still going to be doing this CommitFest > in September
Sure, I only want to do that for ones which have been waiting on author for more than a couple days though. Working on that. > I have been attempting to keep somewhat on top of the stuff that has > become Ready for Committer, but there is too much of it for me to > handle by myself. Yeah, given that we're still in beta, I expected committing to be a problem. Not a surprise. --Josh -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
