HarmeekSingh Bedi <harmeeksi...@gmail.com> writes:
> 1. May be I am mistaken Kindly help me understand a bit more. I do agree
> that passing datums up the node chain helps - but consider the case when
> either Sort or Hash joins spills on disk - large columns that get written
> on
> to the disk will still cause a lot of performance issues {as sorts spills
> will detoast}
No, they don't. What gets sent to disk is normally just the toast
pointer datum (19 bytes or whatever it is these days).
> I did make a fix at least to alleviate this case in the optimizer . But I am
> going to work on a more general approach of expression pruning based on the
> lifetime of an expression. Basically each node will either references or
> generate an expression. Any expression that is generated and is not
> referenced by any top on top will be eliminated.
Sounds like overkill.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
