Marc Munro <m...@bloodnok.com> writes:
> In postgres 9.1 I have created 2 extensions, veil and veil_demo. When I
> install veil, it creates a default (not very useful) version of a
> function: veil_init().
> When I create veil_demo, it replaces this version of the function with
> it's own (useful) version.
> If I drop the extension veil_demo, I am left with the veil_demo version
> of veil_init().
> Is this a feature or a bug? Is there a work-around?
Hmm. I don't think we have any code in there to prohibit the same
object from being made a member of two different extensions ... but this
example suggests that maybe we had better check that.
In general, though, it is not intended that extension creation scripts
use CREATE OR REPLACE, which I gather you must be doing.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
