Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil.sonta...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > What we need is to persist information of a particular constraint to be as > specified - ONLY for this table. We could do that by adding a new column in > pg_constraint like 'connoinh' or something, but I guess we would prefer not > to get into the initdb business.
Uh, why not? I trust you're not imagining this would get back-patched. > Alternatively we could bring about the same > by using a combination of conislocal and coninhcnt. Ugh. New column, please. If you're wondering why, see the flak Robert has been taking lately for replacing pg_class.relistemp. Random changes in the semantics of existing columns are trouble. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers