On 9 August 2011 23:07, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Now that I've got the WaitLatch code fully swapped into my head, > I'm thinking of pushing on to review/commit this patch of Peter's.
Thanks for giving this your attention. I had already planned to produce a new revision this weekend, so I'd appreciate it if you could hold off until Sunday or Monday. > I did not see any objections to such a change. I think we should pull > out this aspect and commit it to 9.1 as well as HEAD. That will provide > one less gotcha for anyone who develops against the 9.1 latch code and > later needs to port to 9.2. That is a good point. I'm aware that someone already made the mistake of giving the value of timeout as milliseconds rather than microseconds at one point, so this seems to be a fertile source of confusion. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
