Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So, when we review patches, we shouldn't be turning up our noses at > imperfect solutions if the solution meets needs of our users.
I think our standards have gone up over the years, and properly so. The fact that we put in hacks some years ago doesn't mean that we still should. I don't really mind hacks^H^H^Hpartial solutions that are clean subsets of the functionality we want to have eventually. I do object to hacks that will create a backwards-compatibility problem when we want to do it right. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html