[adding back hackers so the thread shows the resolution] On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 07:02:55PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Sounds good. Based on my own testing so far, I think that patch will > probably make things measurably better for you, though it won't resolve > every corner case.
The most recent catalog vacuums did vacuum full pg_class in 34 databases on that instance with no new failures. So it looks like the patch fixes it. This is not conclusive, but it looks very good so far. I'll send an update if I see any new errors during the week. Thanks for your help on this. It looks like it has sent you on a merry search through all the catcache related program activities. I'm assuming this patch or some improvement on it will show up in a point release. Meanwhile, if this works as is for couple more days we will resume upgrading the rest of the hosts to 9.0 using this patch. -dg -- David Gould da...@sonic.net 510 536 1443 510 282 0869 If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers