On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 13:50, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >>> The pg_stat_replication view exposes all the fields in >>> StandbyReplyMessage *except* for the timestamp when the message was >>> generated. On an active system this is not all that interesting, but >>> on a mostly idle system that allows the monitoring to react faster >>> than the timeout that actually kicks the other end off - and could be >>> useful in manual debugging scenarios. Any particular reason why this >>> was not exposed as it's own column? >> >> I wondered the same thing. Sounds like a good idea. > > I can go do that. Care to argue^Wbikeshed for a specific name?
reply_timestamp -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
