On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 20:54, Josh Berkus wrote: > > Dann, > > > From a growth standpoint, I think it is a much better idea to focus on > > their strong points. Look at the things each competitor can do best. > > Try to think of ways to get the same functionality from PostgreSQL. If > > it is impossible [or currently infeasible] to meet the functionality, > > then close the gap. > > You are, of course, correct. We will have to prioritize which "gaps" mean > the most to us. For example, if I was to make a "top six list": > > -- Lack of comprehensive GUI admin tools > -- Lack of replication and point in time recovery > -- PL/pgSQL does not 100% replace PL/SQL or T-SQL Stored Procedures > -- Miscellaneous speed/optimization issues > -- Need good GUI installer, including installer for Postgres+PHP+Apache > -- Win32 Port I know I (not knowing Oracle PL/SQL) have a hard time find enough docs on PL/pgSQL, even with buying Bruce's and the German PG Developers books.
I'm personally having a hard time learning all the in's and out's of the trigger/rule stuff. I know I can use more of them, but have a hard time. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
