Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> (IOW, +1 for inventing a second macro to use in the delay loop only.)
> Beautiful. Got a naming preference for that second macro? I
> suggested TAS_SPIN() because it's what you use when you spin, as
> opposed to what you use in the uncontended case, but I'm not attached
> to that.
I had been thinking TAS_CONTENDED, but on reflection there's not a
strong argument for that over TAS_SPIN. Do what you will.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
