Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 22:25, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> How can we improve things here? I've toyed with the idea of installing
>> pg_regress.so so that we can refer to it relative to $libdir, but that
>> might be a bit invasive, especially if we were to try to back-patch it
>> as far as 8.3.
> Would turning pg_regress.so into an extension and using that way fix
> it? That won't help for the 9.0->9.1 stage, but it would for
> 9.1->9.2...
Not really excited about that. The contrib regression tests already
exercise the extension functionality, so making pg_regress.so into
another one would just reduce the number of code paths being covered.
In any case, if we don't find a way to allow automated testing of
pg_upgrade from the pre-9.1 versions, we have not fixed the problem.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
