Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >> I liked the old one better. ;-)
> AFAICS, those plans are identical, except for a minor difference in > the cost of scanning test2. The point is that the estimate of the result size is worse in 8.4.8. I am not, however, convinced that 8.4.7 was actually smarter ... it may have been getting the right answer for the wrong reason. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers