On 2 Září 2011, 15:44, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On fre, 2011-09-02 at 11:01 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote: >> What about logging it with a lower level, e.g. NOTICE instead of the >> current LOG? If that's not a solution then a new GUC is needed I >> guess. > > Changing the log level is not the appropriate solution. Make it a > configuration parameter.
Why is it inappropriate solution? There's a log_checkpoints GUC that drives it and you can either get basic info (summary of the checkpoint) or detailed log (with a lower log level). In the first patch I've proposed a new GUC (used to set how often the info should be logged or disable it), but Josh Berkus pointed out that I should get rid of it if I can. Which is what I've done in the following patches. Tomas -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers