On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 20:12, Jaime Casanova <ja...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> Attached patch implements a "low watermark wal location" in the >> walsender shmem array. Setting this value in a walsender prevents >> transaction log removal prior to this point - similar to how >> wal_keep_segments work, except with an absolute number rather than >> relative. > > cool! just a question, shouldn't we clean the value after the base > backup has finished?
We should. Thanks, will fix! -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers