Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of lun sep 05 11:02:23 -0300 2011: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 15:55, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > >> Well, I assume we are done for another five years. The includes removed > >> were minimal, especially considering five years of work. > > > > What I wouldn't mind seeing is a graph of all includes and what they > > include. This might help figure out what layering violations there are > > like the one that caused this mess. I think I've seen tools to do this > > already somewhere. > > http://doxygen.postgresql.org will do some of that, but I think not > globally - but if you click into one header, I think it shows you the > map from that perspective.
Yeah; and it isn't always complete, because some graphs tend to get too unwieldy so it has to prune (you can see this because some nodes show up with red borders). I am not sure it is really feasible to build a complete graph for all headers. We have too many of them and too many dependencies. Another useful graph to see is what files include a given header. A funny thing is that doxygen doesn't always display this; for example http://doxygen.postgresql.org/rel_8h.html -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
