On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 03:44, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Fujii - the original goal here was to avoid having a unexplained >> disconnection in the logs. The only way to do this cleanly is to have >> a disconnection reason passed to the walsender, rather than just a >> blind signal. Looks like we need to multiplex or other mechanism. > > That's an idea. But what about the patch that I proposed before? > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-08/msg00816.php
Seems like a good solution to me - I hadn't noticed that patch before posting my complaint. I don't think it's a problem if it logs it multiple times when it happens - I think it's a much bigger problem that it logs it when it didn't actually do anything. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers