On lör, 2011-09-10 at 16:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Of course, this means that just building a source tarball marked > "alpha1" isn't real useful. If we're going to do alpha releases, we > have to have buy-in from packagers (or at least from the Windows > installer team) to do follow-on package wrapping.
Yeah, and we aimed for that initially, but it didn't happen. And especially the Windows installers have the highest overhead of any of the packaging efforts, so it's unclear how to get them on board consistently. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
