Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > Isn't the naming of the xlog files slightly bogus?
No doubt, but by now there's enough replication-ish third-party code
that knows about them that I'm afraid changing these conventions would
be much more painful than it's worth.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
