On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 10:26 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> > Complete isolation at the user level, allowing an ISP to support
> > multiple independent customers on a server without having to fiddle with
> > multiple back ends each running on a separate port, a feature that MySQL
> > has had for as far back as I can recall, and one of the reasons ISPs are
> > more likely to offer MySQL than PostgreSQL.
> 
> Now this would definitely be nice. It is frustrating that we don't have 
> per database users.

Hmm, what does the GUC db_user_namespace  do then ?

it says "Enables per-database user names."


-- 
-------
Hannu Krosing
PostgreSQL Unlimited Scalability and Performance Consultant
2ndQuadrant Nordic
PG Admin Book: http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to