On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 10:26 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Complete isolation at the user level, allowing an ISP to support > > multiple independent customers on a server without having to fiddle with > > multiple back ends each running on a separate port, a feature that MySQL > > has had for as far back as I can recall, and one of the reasons ISPs are > > more likely to offer MySQL than PostgreSQL. > > Now this would definitely be nice. It is frustrating that we don't have > per database users.
Hmm, what does the GUC db_user_namespace do then ? it says "Enables per-database user names." -- ------- Hannu Krosing PostgreSQL Unlimited Scalability and Performance Consultant 2ndQuadrant Nordic PG Admin Book: http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers