On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> writes: >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> As has been mentioned a couple times, we're well overdue for updates of >>> the back branches. Seems like time to get that done, so we'll be >>> wrapping 8.2.x and up this Thursday for release Monday the 26th. > >> 8.2 up, including 9.1.1? I'm not sure our QA guys will be able to cope >> with verification of so many individual installers in that timeframe - >> 8.2 - 9.0 is hard enough to do in one go. > > Well, all the pre-9.1 branches are definitely badly in need of updates. > 9.1 maybe could go without at this point, but we do have one crasher bug > and one serious memory leak fixed there, neither new in 9.1. I'd just > as soon not establish a precedent for not releasing the same fixes at > the same time in all branches. > > How about we wrap them all, but you could let your team slip the 9.1 > update for a day or so if they need more time? It's certainly less > critical than the older branches.
OK, well we can push the installers much more quickly over the CDN anyway. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
