Excerpts from David Fetter's message of mar sep 20 21:22:32 -0300 2011: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:13:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Probably a more interesting question is why we wouldn't change > > autovacuum so that it calls this automatically for foreign tables. > > How about a per-table setting that tells autovacuum whether to do > this? Seems reasonable. Have autovacuum assume that foreign tables are not to be analyzed, unless some reloption is set. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
