"David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> wrote: > On Sep 22, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Hmm, if there's a citext--unpackaged--1.0.sql and also >> citext--1.0--1.1.sql, is it really necessary to have >> citext--unpackaged--1.1.sql? Shouldn't the upgrade facility be >> able to just run both scripts? > > No, because if 1.1 was installed on 8.4, you'd need the commands > to move all its functions into the extension, not re-create them. Shouldn't a version installed on 8.4 be installed as "unpackaged"? Doesn't citext--unpackaged--1.0.sql contain the commands to move all its functions into the extension? -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
