On mån, 2011-09-26 at 19:41 +0900, crocket wrote: > MySQL already has unsigned INT type, and it has double the range of > signed INT type. > It's not just the bigger range that UINT type brings. > If unsigned INT type exists, I wouldn't have to execute "create domain > UINT" in every database. > > If "INT unsigned" and "SERIAL unsigned" exist, PostgreSQL would bring > more convenience to users. >
I believe there have been many discussions about this in the past, outlining the various issues that would come with this project. A first step would be to start implementing this in user space and see how much breaks. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
