Jamie Fox wrote: > Thanks, I'm following the thread "pg_upgrade automatic testing" and > will try the patch just detailed there.
I have applied the patch to head and 9.1.X. We still have a win32 bug to fix. It is a shame I was not able to fix these before 9.1.1 was released. :-( --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > > On tis, 2011-09-27 at 16:19 -0700, Jamie Fox wrote: > >> > >> It fails at this stage: > >> > >> ? ? Restoring user relation files > >> ? ? linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2613 to > >> /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12570 > >> ? ? linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2683 to > >> /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12572 > >> ? ? Mismatch of relation names: database "prod1", old rel > >> pg_toast.pg_toast_54542379, new rel pg_toast.pg_toast_16735 > >> ? ? Failure, exiting > > > > This issue is known and a fix is currently being discussed. > > > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
